Released June 2016
Source data: 2014 DHS
Note that a more recent national survey – the 2015 Malaria Indicator Survey – is also available. However, the 2014 DHS sample size is much larger, and precedes the 2015 MIS by only about 10 months. For this reason, Kenya’s current EquityTool is based on the 2014 DHS.
# of survey questions in original wealth index: 38
# of variables in original index: 135
# of survey questions in EquityTool: 13
# of variables in EquityTool: 15
Questions:
Question | Option 1 | Option 2 | Option 3 | |
Q1 | Does your household have: electricity? | Yes | No | |
Q2 | a television? | Yes | No | |
Q3 | a sofa? | Yes | No | |
Q4 | a cupboard? | Yes | No | |
Q5 | a DVD player? | Yes | No | |
Q6 | a radio? | Yes | No | |
Q7 | a table? | Yes | No | |
Q8 | a clock? | Yes | No | |
Q9 | What is the main material of the floor of your dwelling? | Cement | Earth, sand | Other |
Q10 | What is the main material of the external walls of your dwelling? | Dung/mud/soil | Other | |
Q11 | What is the main material of the roof of your dwelling? | Thatch/grass/makuti | Other | |
Q12 | What type of fuel does your household mainly use for cooking? | Wood | LPG/Natural gas | Other |
Q13 | What kind of toilet facility do members of your household usually use? | No facility/bush/field | Other |
Technical notes:
The standard simplification process was applied to achieve high agreement with the original wealth index. Kappa was greater than 0.75 for the national indices. For the urban indices, the kappa was 0.749. Rather than add another question in order to achieve a kappa above 0.75, the kappa of 0.749 was deemed acceptable since it allowed for a shorter questionnaire. Details on the standard process can be found in this article. The data used to identify important variables comes from the factor weights released by ICF.
Level of agreement:
National Population
(n=36,430) |
Urban only population
(n=13,914) |
|
% agreement | 83.9% | 84.2% |
Kappa statistic | 0.752 | 0.749 |
Respondents in the original dataset were divided into 3 groups – those in the 1st and 2nd quintiles (poorest 40%), those in the 3rd quintile, and those in the 4th and 5th quintiles (richest 40%). After calculating their wealth using the simplified index, they were again divided into 3 groups. Agreement between the original data and our simplified index is presented above.
What does this mean?
When shortening and simplifying the index to make it easier for programs to use to assess equity, it no longer matches the original index with 100% accuracy. At an aggregate level, this error is minimal, and this methodology was deemed acceptable for programmatic use by an expert panel. However, for any given individual, especially those already at a boundary between two quintiles, the quintile the EquityTool assigns them to may differ to their quintile according to the original DHS wealth index.
This graph illustrates the difference between the EquityTool generated index and the full DHS wealth index. Among all of those people (20% of the population) originally identified as being in the poorest quintile, approximately 84% are still identified as being in the poorest quintile when we use the simplified index. However, approximately 16% of people are now classified as being in quintile 2. From a practical standpoint, all of these people are relatively poor. Yet, it is worthwhile to understand that the simplified index of 13 questions produces results which are not identical to using all 38 questions in the original survey.
Here is the same information on the movement between national quintiles when using the EquityTool versus the original DHS wealth index, in table form:
EquityTool National Quintiles | |||||||
Quintile 1 | Quintile 2 | Quintile 3 | Quintile 4 | Quintile 5 | Total | ||
Original DHS National Quintiles | Quintile 1 | 16.8% | 2.8% | 0.4% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
Quintile 2 | 3.0% | 12.7% | 4.2% | 0.1% | 0% | 20% | |
Quintile 3 | 0.1% | 4.5% | 12.1% | 3.3% | 0% | 20% | |
Quintile 4 | 0% | 0.1% | 3.3% | 14.0% | 2.6% | 20% | |
Quintile 5 | 0% | 0% | 0% | 2.5% | 17.5% | 20% | |
Total | 19.9% | 20.1% | 20% | 19.9% | 20.1% | 100% |
The following graph provides information on the movement between urban quintiles when using the EquityTool versus the original DHS wealth index:
The following table provides the same information on the movement between urban quintiles when using the EquityTool versus the original DHS wealth index:
EquityTool Urban Quintiles | |||||||
Quintile 1 | Quintile 2 | Quintile 3 | Quintile 4 | Quintile 5 | Total | ||
Original DHS Urban Quintiles | Quintile 1 | 17.50% | 2.50% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 20% |
Quintile 2 | 2.80% | 13.70% | 3.30% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 20% | |
Quintile 3 | 0.00% | 3.30% | 12.20% | 4.20% | 0.30% | 20% | |
Quintile 4 | 0.00% | 0.20% | 3.60% | 11.00% | 5.10% | 20% | |
Quintile 5 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 4.70% | 14.50% | 20% | |
Total | 19.9% | 20.1% | 20% | 19.9% | 20.1% | 100% |
Data interpretation considerations:
Metrics for Management provides technical assistance services to those using the EquityTool, or wanting to collect data on the wealth of their program beneficiaries. Please contact support@equitytool.org and we will assist you.